Source Audit Workflow for Investment Research
Audit an investment note for citation quality, stale data, weak claims, missing primary sources, and unsupported conclusions.
Informational research only. ThesisLoop is not investment advice, a stock recommendation, or a guarantee of returns.
Who this page is for
Investors, creators, analysts, and subscribers reviewing research quality
Example assets to start with
Start with a company, sector, watchlist, or position you already follow.
Why this matters now
As more research is produced with AI, source audits help readers distinguish evidence-backed analysis from polished unsupported summaries.
ThesisLoop research prompt
Audit this investment note and classify every major claim by source quality, date, confidence, and missing evidence.
Start with this promptEvidence checks
Check whether every major number and claim has a source.
Flag stale data, secondary-only evidence, and circular citations.
Prioritize filings, transcripts, official releases, and regulator sources.
Mark conclusions that exceed the cited evidence.
Research questions
Which claims are most exposed to source weakness?
What primary documents should replace secondary sources?
Where does the note overstate confidence?
What should be removed before publication or export?
Keywords this page covers
The goal is not a keyword list. The goal is to turn a search query into a specific, source-backed research workflow.
Related research topics
Move from a broad theme into adjacent company-level diligence.